<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OneWorld Progressive Institute, Inc. Blog &#187; Web Resources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/category/web-resources/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oneworldpi.org/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>OneWorld Progressive Institute, Inc Seeks to Enrich the Broader Community.</title>
		<link>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/234</link>
		<comments>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/234#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N'Zinga Shäni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["21st Century Conversations" TV programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[be stronger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enriching CT communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health literacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oneworld progressive institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stand together]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teachers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Find "21st Century Conversations" on your PEG access station in CT. Watch as retired school principal, Marc Palmieri, discuss team-building with parents and teachers from various school districts. When you visit our site visit each section; browse our very informative and educational video programs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff">Visit our OneWorld&#8217;s website @ www.oneworldpi.org</span></strong><br />
Learn about our flagship TV program <strong><em>&#8220;21st Century Conversations&#8221;</em></strong> on your PEG Access stations in CT. We are on AT&amp;T U-Verse, Cablevision, Comcast, Cox &amp; MetroCast.  If you cannot find us, ask your public access station to get &amp; air<em><strong><span style="color: #0000ff"> &#8220;21st CC.</span></strong></em></p>
<p>We focus on Health Literacy, Education-at-every-level and on Civic Engagement. We are about enriching our communities on every level. We profile organizations; we engage students positively, and we provide constructive information. Join us in these efforts. Find <em><strong><span style="color: #0000ff">&#8220;21st Century Conversations&#8221;</span></strong></em> on your PEG access station in CT. Watch as retired school principal, Marc Palmieri, discuss team-building with parents and teachers from various school districts. When you visit our site visit each section; browse our very informative and educational video programs. Watch clips from student participants. Join us as we seek to engage residents in positive ways; learn about their issues of concern and the things they want to see changed in this the 21st century.  <span style="color: #0000ff">Meet students from Hamden, New Haven, West Haven and North Haven. </span></p>
<p>Learn what are the educational concerns parents in Bpt, NH, Hamden and WH have; they are the same concerns you have.  OneWorld is about building a more positive community from infancy to old age.   <span style="text-decoration: underline">Let us stand together so we can ALL be stronger.</span>  Join us.  Please send us an email;  go to the Contact Us page.  Peace &amp; grace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/234/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let Us Recognize Smart Responsible Students</title>
		<link>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/207</link>
		<comments>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/207#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 03:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N'Zinga Shäni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multicultural Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caitlin Morrisey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamarr Daniels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khadijah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oneworld progressive institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Positive Examples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recognize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsible students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilbur Cross High]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneworldpi.org/blog/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six kids making us proud = 13 comments (really 12; one is an editor's test)
one kid being impulsive and stupid - 29 comments (and counting)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We at OneWorld are taking the liberty of copying and reposting the comment below which was posted to the New Haven Independent web site to an article about our most recent TV program titled &#8220;Kids Get Their Say.&#8221;  The article is written by Zak Stone.  It is a story about six wonderful high school students from Wilbur Cross , Hamden  and West Haven High schools.  These are smart, responsible students.  We would really appreciate hearing what you think about them.  They are all college bound.  In the 6th grade Caitlin Morrisey started a recycling program in her school.  <span style="text-decoration: underline">That program has now been replicated in all schools in West Haven.</span>   Jamarr plans to become a law enforcement officer; he is also a product of Wilbur Cross High School.</p>
<p>We thank Andrew for his wise comment.  We would appreciaite hearing what you think.  Please go to <strong>The Kids Get Their Say</strong>  BY ZAK STONE | APR 28, 2010, at the NHI site at the link below.  Click onto Schools and scroll until you see the title.   Then go to the other story    <strong><a href="http://www.newhavenindependent.org/">http://www.newhavenindependent.org</a> See Schools</strong></p>
<p>titled:  &#8221;Police: Girl Stole School Bus, Hit Cop Car.&#8221;   Please read Andrew&#8217;s comment.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hey all—I can’t help but notice an unfortunate disparity. On one hand, you get this great forum w/some excellent public school students taken on tough issues and making a lot of sense. One of the students, Jamarr Daniels, is from the much-maligned Wilbur Cross High School. My comment will be the 13th one on this story.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the May 3rd issue of the Independent has a story about another Wilbur Cross student who goes for a destructive “joy ride” on a bus. THAT story attracts 29 comments.</p>
<p>6 kids making us proud - 13 comments.</p>
<p>1 kid being impulsive and stupid &#8211; 29 comments (and counting).</p>
<p>Jamarr, Caitlin, Eric, Brandon, Khadijah and Linette &#8211; please keep making sense and doing what you’re doing. This reader and community member wishes you the very best.&#8221;  Our question is &#8212; What do we value?  How do we communicate that to our children?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/207/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMA Denounced Medicare in 1964! Resist Conservative &#8216;Group Think&#8217; and Pundits&#8217; Dictates. Support Health Care Reform with Public Option!</title>
		<link>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/169</link>
		<comments>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/169#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N'Zinga Shäni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic imperative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare-type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral clarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resist group think]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support Health Care Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneworldpi.org/blog/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please let us resist the conservative &#8216;group think&#8217; and stop listening to the dictates of the pundits. They are hoping that we will listen and act as they dictate then they can claim susccess of their predictions.  Don&#8217;t give them the satisfaction.  They are being paid to be pundits; their motives are far from pure.  They [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please let us resist the conservative &#8216;group think&#8217; and stop listening to the dictates of the pundits. They are hoping that we will listen and act as they dictate then they can claim susccess of their predictions.  Don&#8217;t give them the satisfaction.  They are being paid to be pundits; their motives are far from pure.  They do not care about anything but raking in the big bucks.  <strong><span style="color: #800000">Americans NEEDS good health care reform in 2010 and we NEED the Medicare-type public option.</span></strong></p>
<p>&#8220;The federal government&#8217;s involvement with this issue (of compulsory health insurance) began in earnest in 1934. <a href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj16n3-3.html#FOOTNOTE_6">[6]</a> In that year President Franklin Roosevelt established the Committee on Economic Security (CES) and charged it with drafting a Social Security bill.  The Social Security Act signed into law on August 14, 1935, empowered the Social Security Board (SSB) to study &#8220;related&#8221; areas, and on August 15, 1935, Roosevelt appointed an Interdepartmental Committee to Coordinate Health and Welfare Activities to pursue the health insurance issue.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;<span style="color: #800000"><strong>Legislative efforts in the 1930s and 1940s went nowhere.</strong> </span>The American Medical Association (AMA) strongly opposed compulsory national health insurance, <strong><span style="color: #800000">denouncing it as socialized medicine and mounting costly efforts to defeat it.</span> </strong><a href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj16n3-3.html#FOOTNOTE_10">[10]</a> President Roosevelt withheld his active support. Opinion polls indicated strong public opposition, with 76.3 percent of the public in a 1942 <em>Fortune</em> poll saying that the government should not provide free medical care (Cantril 1951: 440).  <span style="color: #800000"><strong>You can read all about this at</strong></span>: <a href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/"><strong>www.cato.org/pubs/</strong></a>  (This is exactly what is being done today.  The private insurance companies reportedly are spending millions weekly.  The media is colluding in this so as to boost its own advertising revenues.)</p>
<p><strong>The resulting <span style="color: #800000">Medicare Bill</span>&#8211; prized by many today and some of whom likely opposed it in the 1940&#8217;s and 50&#8217;s &#8212; </strong><span style="color: #800000"><strong>was signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson on July 30, 1965; 31 years later!  </strong><span style="color: #000000"><strong>How many of those with Medicare today would give it up?</strong>  We can save $Billions by rolling all of the multiple types of public health care plans that now exist (SAGA, HUSHKY, Medicaid, etc) into one Medicare-type Public Option plan. Focus on reducing Medicare fraud and put all of the adminstrative savings into covering more people.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #800000"><span style="color: #333300">M</span></span>ore than a million medical professionals today support health care reform with a public option!  Those with Medicare can move anywhere in the country and they still have Medicare; they do not have to wait 30, 60 or 90 days; they cannot be denied coverage due to a pre-existing condition. <span style="color: #800000"><strong> That is what we all need: A Medicare-type public option.  Write, call, email, fax, get in touch with your elected representatives.  </strong><span style="color: #000000"><span style="text-decoration: underline">They are hearing from the lobbyists; let them hear from you.</span></span></span></p>
<p>Like many others, I wish that President Obama had more direct involvement with crafting the original health care bill; instead he expected members of Congress to act like responsible adults, so he left it up to them.  He had too many things on the radar. Being a smart person, he thought that the moral clarity and the economic imperatives were so clear that Democrats and Republicans would act in the best interest of the American people.  He was wrong.  Now let us all demand that our elected represntatives act in our own best interest and pass health care with a public option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/169/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access to Affordable Health Care &#8211; An Imperative- The 21st Century&#8217;s Civil Rights Issue</title>
		<link>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/165</link>
		<comments>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/165#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N'Zinga Shäni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[39% increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Cross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[involved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobilize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not-too-late]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obstructionist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oneworld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reconcilliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ripp-off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Term-limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneworldpi.org/blog/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Health Reform is ALIVE – Let us ensure it gets legs and that it walks through the House and the Senate. This is the civil rights issue of the 21st century. Access to affordable health care is an imperative.  People, this cannot fail. It must not fail.
Anyone who watched the “summit on health care” with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Health Reform is ALIVE – Let us ensure it gets legs and that it walks through the House and the Senate. This is the civil rights issue of the 21st century. Access to affordable health care is an imperative.  People, this cannot fail. It must not fail.</p>
<p>Anyone who watched the “summit on health care” with the President and the Republican and Democratic leaders last week can have no doubt that the Republicans have no interest in meeting the needs of the millions of Americans who have no health care coverage, or access to affordable care.  It was a remarkable display of indifference and commitment to big pharmaceuticals and the private insurance companies.  Whether we are Democrats or Republicans we would have to be blind not to see what was happening. As an American citizen I was stunned at  John Boehner, Republican House Leader&#8217;s behavior.  He is truly frightening.</p>
<p>The president tried to get everyone in the room to focus on areas of agreement. Someone I once respected, Lamar Alexander, was incredibly obstructionist.  Many of the Republicans just flat out lied and did everything they could to undermine the President’s efforts at cooperation and bipartisanship.  The only obvious exceptions to the stone-walling and obstructionist behavior were Senator Thomas Coburn (a very conservative doctor from Oklahoma) and Representative Dave Camp, a lawyer from Michigan.  John Boehner has consistently been one of the most offensive, hostile and irresponsible representative in the House.  Eric Cantor is close behind.  Some of the Democrats are pretty spineless also.  This is why people like Bayh are leaving; they want to get work done, but Washington is in freeze mode.  There should be term limits.  Too many of our elected officials are serving the lobbyists rather than the people who elected them.  When they stay too long they get too powerful.</p>
<p>Finally, the President has gotten the message.  The Republicans have no intention of meeting the needs of the American people.  He has told the Democrats to get some spine and call a vote by the end of the month or soon.  This is where we – the people—come in. It is <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">not too late</span></strong> to get Comprehensive Health Care Reform in America, and it is <strong>NOT TOO LATE for a Public Option</strong>.  <strong>We NEED to Mobilize!  </strong>Since the Republicans are not going to support any plan the President put forth anyway, we might as well go for broke and work for real comprehensive reform.</p>
<p>In <strong>2007</strong>, the <strong>CEOs</strong> at the <strong>top</strong> seven for-profit, private <strong>insurance</strong> companies pocketed an <strong>average</strong> <strong>of $14.2 million each in total compensation (</strong><cite><strong>blog.aflcio.org)</strong></cite></p>
<p><cite><strong> </strong></cite>In the past few years insurance premiums have gone up 100 &#8212; 150 percent.  These costs are passed on to those who have such coverage and to their employers.  This is why many companies are cutting back on the benefits they offer. Insurance companies price their premiums much above what they expect inflation to be; this guarantees their investors a solid profit.  This is what the Republicans want to ensure.</p>
<p> In an article written by <strong>Jason Shafrin, Ph.D., economist in</strong> the <a title="Return to front page" href="http://healthcare-economist.com/">Healthcare Economist</a> magazine we learn that William W. McGuire, CEO of UnitedHealth Group, received compensation of <strong>$124.8 million in 2005.</strong>  <em><a title="Managed Care Mag - top exec pay 2000" href="http://www.managedcaremag.com/archives/0109/0109.compmon.html" target="_blank">Managed Care Magazine</a></em> also says that the average executive compensation (excluding unexercised stock options) for an executive of a ‘<strong>top 10 for profit health plan’ was $11.7 million and that was back in 2000.  </strong>The compensation for this one executive could pay the health care premium for 34,000 Americans.  Yet, most of these wealthy people pay no health care premiums at all.  Recently Anthem Blue Cross in California announced a 39 percent increase in health premiums on many customers; the increase is effective March 1; two weeks’ notice! They are raising premiums now to gauarantee their profits for a long time to come.  I am all for free markets, but this is straight  <strong><span style="color: #990033">ripp off.</span></strong></p>
<p>What justifies this increase?  <strong>GREED and POWER</strong>. They do it because they can.  What accounts for the extreme opposition to health care reform by the wealthy and powerful, and by the Republicans? It has nothing to do with these people caring about the average American; far from it. It has nothing to do with anyone losing coverage, or govt. being in our pockets; neither is it due to concern that the govt. is coming between patients and their doctors.  None of that is true.  These private insurance companies and for-profit health care groups simply want to maintain their enormous profit margins.  The Republicans simply want the President to fail. These people could care less about the average American.   <strong>UnitedHealth Group&#8217;s Profit Rises 30% </strong><strong>UnitedHealth Group&#8217;s 4th-quarter profit climbs; commercial enrollment continues to stumble </strong><strong>By TOM MURPHY AP Business Writer, </strong>INDIANAPOLIS January 21, 2010 (AP)</p>
<p>There are many groups &#8211;across the country&#8211; that are fighting for health care reform. Sadly, the mainstream media is not telling us about them; we hear a great deal about the Tea-Partiers and those who oppose health care.  We at OneWorld strongly encourage people to get involved and network with others who want reform; it is our only hope. </p>
<p>Visit our web site <a href="http://www.oneworldpi.org/">www.oneworldpi.org</a> the Health Literacy Section and get in touch with a state, community or national group.  Write an email or a letter to your congressional representative, or make phone calls.  Encourage family members and friends and church affiliates to participate.  This is the civil rights issue of the 21<sup>st</sup> Century. Americans should not have to decide whether to have health care or a roof over their heads. The President and Congress can use Democrats only to pass a health care reform bill.  The Republicans did it when they wanted to pass the Bush tax cuts. They are now screaming about how unfair it will be to use reconcilliation, but it was fine when they used it on 14 of the 19 occassions it has been used since 1980.   Click the links below to get the fact on reconcilliation and the Republican and Democratic use of this process.  The hypocrisy is palpable.  Please get involved to relieved the suffering of hard-working Americans who have no access or limited access to affordable health care. </p>
<h3><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2612737820100226">FACTBOX-U.S. Democrats try to expedite healthcare <em>bill</em> | Reuters</a></h3>
<div>Feb 26, 2010 <strong>&#8230;</strong> Republican President Ronald Reagan <em>used reconciliation</em> several <em>times</em> <strong>&#8230;</strong> In 2001 and 2003, Republican <em>President George W</em>. <em>Bush used reconciliation</em> to <em>push through</em> <strong>&#8230;</strong> option” to <em>pass</em> a <em>bill</em> of this magnitude and importance, <strong>&#8230;</strong> to manage their own affairs so <em>he wants</em> government to do it for us. <strong>&#8230;</strong><br />
<cite>www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2612737820100226 </cite></div>
<p>Mar 4, 2010 <strong>&#8230;</strong> <em>Reconciliation</em> was <em>used</em> &#8220;for <em>tax cuts</em> for the rich twice under <em>Bush</em>.&#8221; <strong>&#8230;</strong> <cite><a href="http://www.politifact.com/.../bush-tax-cuts-were-passed-reconciliations-50-votes/">www.politifact.com/&#8230;/<strong>bush</strong>-<strong>tax</strong>-<strong>cuts</strong>-were-<strong>passed</strong>-<strong>reconciliation</strong>s-50-votes/</a> </cite></p>
<p><cite></cite></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/165/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines Reckless &amp; Irresponsible</title>
		<link>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/118</link>
		<comments>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/118#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N'Zinga Shäni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5% of women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american cancer society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in common]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iud breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iuds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key to survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self examination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standard of care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[under 40]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[young]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneworldpi.org/blog/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The revised recommendations issued by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force concern mammograms and breast self-exams. Under the new guidelines, the task force now says:

 Most women in their 40’s should not routinely get mammograms.
 Women 50 to 74 should get mammograms every other year until they turn 75, after which the risks and benefits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The revised recommendations issued by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force concern mammograms and breast self-exams. Under the new guidelines, the task force now says:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> <strong>Most women in their 40’s should not routinely get mammograms.</strong></li>
<li><strong> Women 50 to 74 should get mammograms every other year until they turn 75, after which the risks and benefits are unknown.</strong></li>
<li> <strong>The value of breast exams by doctors is unknown.</strong></li>
<li> <strong>Breast self-exams are of no value.</strong> <em>(<span style="color: #ff0000;">This is the most shocking. Four of five young women I know to have been diagnosed with breast cancer in the past two years found the lump in their breast through self examination</span>)</em></li>
<li> <strong><span style="color: #3366ff;">T<span style="color: #0000ff;">hese guidelines are in disagreement with both the recommendations of the American Cancer Society, and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists.</span></span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>Who makes up this panel of so-called federal experts</strong></span> who recently issued these guidelines about breast cancer screening?  My understanding is there are no oncologists on the panel!  If this is true, how can we have people making recommendations who are not experts in what they are recommending?</p>
<p>Who appointed them?  Do we know if any have been lobbyists for the insurance industry? What exactly are the main objectives of these new and reckless guidelines?</p>
<h3><span style="color: #800000;">How can a woman examining her own breast be a detriment to her health?</span></h3>
<ul>
<li> We need to encourage women to be proactive and vigilant in maintaining health and well-being.</li>
<li>Women should know from in their teens what a normal healthy breast should feel like.</li>
<li>Women with a family history of breast cancer need to be particularly vigilant and start screening 10 years before the age their mother or affected first degree relative was diagnosed.</li>
<li>We are not advocating for added radiation to any part of the body; we do believe that women should find good, competent OB/GYN physicians, develop a relationship and get good reliable medical advice and guidance. Women should not depend on sound health advice from such panels, but rather from health care experts who know their family history and personal health condition.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>According to an article in the NY Times dated Nov. 20, 2009, “This panel was appointed by the prior administration, by former President George Bush.”  President Obama has been vilified by some for a panel he had no part in selecting.   This type of Task Force has been in existence since 1984.    Could it be that the prior administration put in place a group to do exactly what this group is doing?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> What exactly are the benefits of these guidelines?</li>
<li> What are they intended to accomplish and for whom?</li>
</ul>
<p><em>&#8220;Breast cancer is most common in women over 50. But that doesn&#8217;t mean it can&#8217;t occur in younger women. There are many cases in women in their 40s. And while it&#8217;s far more rare in women under 40, women in their 20s and 30s can and do get breast cancer.  But it is relatively rare. Less than 5 percent of all breast cancers occur in women under age 40.&#8221;</em> <strong>While this might be true in some abstract form</strong>, <strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">if your child is one of the 5% then to you it is NOT rare at all.  Right here in CT between 2007 and 2009, I personally know of five women in their 30&#8217;s who have the most aggressive form of breast cancer. </span></strong></p>
<p><em>&#8220;All too often, a young woman may be misdiagnosed. She may detect a lump or a thickening, go in to see her doctor, and be told she just has lumpy breasts or &#8220;fibrocystic disease&#8221; and should be followed. And she is—until her doctors realize it&#8217;s more serious than they initially believed. Then, they step into action. This is why even though the vast majority of lumps in women under 35 are benign, it&#8217;s important for doctors to be vigilant and bear in mind that young women can develop breast cancer.&#8221;</em> <strong>(The above two paragraphs in quotes are from Dr. Susan Love&#8217;s web site at <a href="http://www.dslrf.org">www.dslrf.org</a>)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Another area of breast cancer that needs to be very closely examined and research is&#8211; to see if there is a possible relationship between using an IUD and developing breast cancer.    <span style="color: #0000ff;">An IUD, or intrauterine device, is a tiny, plastic, T-shaped instrument inserted into a woman&#8217;s uterus for the purpose of preventing unwanted pregnancies.  Compared with other methods of birth control, IUDs are considered to be among the most cost effective and convenient method of contraceptives available.</span></strong></p>
<p>One of the young women I know was put on birth control pills to regulate her period; she then developed breast cancer.   Another had been on birth control pills for several years; she was diagnosed with bilateral tumors at age 34. The other three all had IUDs for four or more years and they were all diagnosed with an aggressive form of breast cancer in their early to mid-30&#8217;s.   While there may be many other reasons why these young women are now sharing this unfortunate distinction, we are saying this needs to be looked at more closely.  When we have raised this question with some physicians we have gotten a shrug of the shoulder and a:  &#8216;as far as I know, there has been no link established.&#8217;  <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>A link can only be established if there is research and careful study. If breast cancer is indeed rare among young women, when five young women show up with this disease, and birth control methods seem to be the most obvious thing they have in common, it needs to be looked at very closely.</strong></span> We can only find out if we explore.  While individual doctors are not responsible for research, vigilant and astute doctors are often responsible for promulgating solutions. These findings should be reported to the CDC.</p>
<p>While we know that we need to be careful how we react to information on the web, there are times when such information is very helpful in pointing us in important directions to get valuable information.  Here is one such link:</p>
<p><a href="http://community.breastcancer.org/forum/27/topic/706634"><strong>Breast Cancer Topic: Mirena IUD?</strong></a><em><br />
<strong><span style="color: #008000;">http://community.breastcancer.org/forum/27/topic/706634</span></strong></em><br />
31 posts &#8211; 25 authors &#8211; Last post: Oct 8, 2009<br />
<strong><em>My radiation oncologist suspects that the Mirena IUD, which I had inserted 3+ years prior, could have been the cause of my breast cancer. &#8230;</em></strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Breast cancer in the 30’s might not be as rare as we tend to think.</span> The possible connection between the use of IUDs and breast cancer needs to be explored.  One of the women went in and had a bilateral mastectomy and the doctors did not remove her IUD, or even discussed it!  Yet, for another of the women her doctor said the IUD had to be removed immediately. Unfortunately, there is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">no uniformity in standard of care on these issues.</span> It seems to be the luck of the draw, and who you have as a doctor.  This is why it is important to be able to check for key background information on your health provider. <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>It is very important that you get the best and most effective treatment at the outset; cancer does not allow kindly for do-overs.</strong></span> <strong><span style="color: #000000;"> While mammograms might not pick up all invasive forms of cancer early enough, if it picks up 30 percent who can be treated successfully, that will be 57,711 of the estimated 192,370 new cases of invasive breast cancer which occurred among women in the United States during 2009.  Early detection and effective treatment are keys to survival and continued good health.  Since when is 30% of anything not valuable to know?</span></strong></p>
<p>Get familiar with what your breast feels like and ask your doctor to teach you how to do a thorough breast self-exam.  Get your annual check-ups and talk to your health care providers about your concerns. Be proactive; get informed.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Knowledge is power.</strong></span> Empower yourself in 2010.  <strong>Peace and good health to you.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oneworldpi.org/blog/archives/118/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
